Advocacy
How the 2026 California Wildfire Action Plan Impacts Cycling and Trails

How the 2026 California Wildfire Action Plan Impacts Cycling and Trails

Action Alert: Submit Your Comments on the Draft California Wildfire and Landscape Resilience Action Plan by August 7

Wildfires profoundly shape our communities, our natural landscapes, and the trail networks we love to ride. Protecting these spaces requires a proactive strategy. It also demands the voice of the outdoor recreation community. We must ensure agencies prioritize trail access and maintenance.

On June 5, the California Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force released its draft 2026-2031 Wildfire & Landscape Resilience Action Plan (see below). Building on California’s nation-leading wildfire resilience efforts, this statewide strategy aims to accelerate action against pressing wildfire challenges.

But how exactly does this sweeping environmental policy affect mountain bikers and trail stewards?

Read our analysis of the major opportunities and potential threats below. Your voice is critical before the August 7, 2026, public comment deadline.

The Opportunities: Favorable Actions for Outdoor Recreation

The new California Wildfire Action Plan gives trail organizations unique opportunities. They can integrate their efforts directly into statewide resilience goals. The draft plan includes several specific call-outs that benefit our community:

  • Prioritizing Implementation of the Joint Strategy for Sustainable Recreation and Forest Resilience: Pushes for statewide adoption of multi-benefit projects near the wildland-urban interface. This includes building fire-hardened trails and reducing fuels around recreation infrastructure. The state will embed these priorities into Regional Priority Plans.
  • A Clear Mandate to Protect Recreation: The plan sets a stated change objective to “Enhance Recreational Opportunities.” Agencies will measure success by tracking predicted fire severity to recreational resources. The stated goal aims to reduce the predicted risk of loss to our recreational infrastructure.
  • Expanded Shared Stewardship: The 2026 framework provides a major win for trail stewardship organizations. State, federal, and tribal land managers are urged to expand long-term partnership agreements, and utilize tools like Good Neighbor Authority Agreements. This empowers local groups with streamlined cross-boundary planning, contracting, and implementation.
  • Broader Funding Pathways: Funding agencies urged to pilot innovative mechanisms to supplement traditional grants. This creates an important opportunity for the trails community to secure their own block grants and directly incorporate forest resilience enhancements into on-the-ground trail infrastructure.
  • Formal Inclusion in Regional Planning: The 2026 framework shifts focus toward regional resilience portfolios. Local and regional wildfire planning must now incorporate sustainable outdoor recreation. Agencies can no longer treat wildfire mitigation as an isolated silo.

The Risks: Potential Threats to Cycling & Trails

The overarching goals of the plan are necessary for the state’s survival. However, the speed and scale of implementation carry unintended risks for recreation.

  • The “Fire vs. Recreation” Budget Drain: Agencies often face immense pressure to meet wildfire suppression goals. Historically, this pressure cannibalizes non-fire personnel and budgets. Federal and state funding might continue to favor strict fuel treatments over general public land management. This lack of dedicated recreation staff will impair new trail approvals. It will also stall environmental reviews and routine maintenance.
  • Fast-Tracking Risks and “Red Tape” Cuts: The plan relies on emergency proclamations. These declarations fast-track hundreds of critical fuels reduction projects. Environmental review timelines shrink to as little as 30 days. While efficient for fire safety, this rapid acceleration can bypass traditional public comment windows. Heavy machinery operations could inadvertently damage singletrack in high-priority fuel break zones. Crews might alter the trail landscape without consulting recreation groups.
  • Widespread Temporary Closures for Active Treatments: The draft plan aims to significantly scale up active treatments. These include a significant expansion of prescribed fire, cultural burning, and mechanical thinning. Managers will implement these treatments across hundreds of thousands of acres. This action necessitates rolling, temporary, and extended emergency trail closures. To protect recreation access, agencies must prioritize developing better approaches to these temporary closures. We need collaborative strategies that minimize the reduction in community benefits while still ensuring public safety.

Action Alert: Submit Your Comments

We need healthy, resilient forests to sustain the trail systems we cherish. However, we must also protect sustainable recreation and trail infrastructure during these rapid, landscape-scale treatments.

The Task Force needs to hear from the MTB community. Tell them you support wildfire resilience. At the same time, advocate strongly for the protection of trail networks. Demand secure recreation budgets and collaborative planning during the implementation phase.

Deadline to Comment: August 7, 2026

Next Steps: Review the plan and share your feedback. Detail how these strategies impact your local region and recreation access.

Powered By EmbedPress